In this lesson, we are going to use the "weird" rule to prove that the path of a Brownian Motion, , is infinitely long. This will demonstrate, with math, why "normal" calculus fails and why we need to invent a new set of rules.
Lesson 2.1: The Failure of Path Length (Proving "Infinite Wiggliness")
Welcome to Module 2! In our previous module, we established two fundamental concepts: a 'Normal' Path (smooth and predictable) and a 'Random' Path (infinitely wiggly, scaling with the square root of time).
Part 1: How We Measure Path Length in the "Normal World"
Let's start with a simple, predictable path. Imagine a car traveling at a constant speed of 60 mph for 1 hour. The total distance traveled is simply 60 miles.
Let's prove this using "calculus-style" summation. We break the 1-hour journey into tiny time steps, each with size .
In the "normal" world, the tiny distance is proportional to the time step : . So our sum is:
Key Takeaway: For a normal path, the sum is finite because the change is proportional to .
Part 2: Trying to Measure Path Length in the "Random World"
Now, let's try to find the "path length" of our Brownian Motion, , from time 0 to . This is the "Coastline of Britain" problem: how long is a fractal?
We use the same summation logic. The "path length" is the sum of all the tiny absolute changes in position. Our goal is to calculate the value of:
Part 3: The Step-by-Step Derivation of "Infinity"
Step 1: What is the "typical size" of one step, |ΔWᵢ|?
In Lesson 1.3, we proved the "weird scaling" property. The Variance of is . The Standard Deviation (the "typical size") is . Therefore, the "typical size" of a single random step is .
Step 2: Replace the random step with its "typical size."
We are now trying to calculate:
Step 3: Solve the sum.
We are summing the same number, , a total of times.
Step 4: Express n in terms of Δt.
Our total time is . We have steps. The size of each step is . This means , so .
Step 5: Substitute n back into our 'Total Length' equation.
Step 6: Simplify the algebra.
So, our final equation is:
Step 7: The "Aha!" Moment - Take the Limit.
Our original goal was to find the true path length, which is the limit as our "ruler" (the step size ) gets infinitely small.
We have just proven that the "path length" of a Brownian Motion is infinite.
- It Proves Lesson 1.1: We just proved, mathematically, that a random path is "infinitely wiggly." Its total path length is literally infinite, just like a fractal.
- It Proves "No Derivative": The "slope" would be "typically" , which goes to infinity.
- It Forces Us to Find a New Way: Summing the first power () is a dead end. We need a new way to measure the "total variation" of a random path.
Up Next: Quadratic Variation