Lesson 3.4: GARCH Extensions
Capturing more complex volatility dynamics like the leverage effect with EGARCH and GJR-GARCH.
The Limitation of Standard GARCH
The standard GARCH(1,1) model was a huge leap forward, but it has one major limitation inherited from ARCH: it's **symmetric**. It models variance using the *squared* shock (), meaning that a large positive shock has the exact same effect on future volatility as a large negative shock of the same magnitude.
In real financial markets, this is not true. This asymmetry is known as the **leverage effect**.
The Leverage Effect
Empirically, negative news (a negative shock) tends to increase volatility much more than positive news of the same magnitude. A -5% day is much scarier and leads to more future uncertainty than a +5% day. To capture this, we need models that can react asymmetrically to shocks.
Two Popular Asymmetric GARCH Models
The EGARCH model, proposed by Nelson (1991), models the **logarithm** of the variance, which has the nice property of not needing positivity constraints on the coefficients.
EGARCH(1,1) Equation
The key term is . If the coefficient is negative and significant, it confirms the leverage effect: a negative shock will have a larger impact on future volatility than a positive shock.
The GJR-GARCH model, by Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle (1993), provides a simpler way to capture the leverage effect by adding an indicator variable.
GJR-GARCH(1,1) Equation
where if , and otherwise.
A positive and significant indicates a leverage effect. When there is bad news (), the impact of the shock on volatility is , which is larger than the impact from good news.
What's Next? The Capstone Project
We now have a full suite of powerful volatility models. It's time to put them into practice.
In our final lesson for this module, we will perform an end-to-end capstone project: **Modeling and Forecasting the Volatility of the S&P 500** using a GARCH(1,1) model.